8/8/2023 0 Comments Rep. jim jordan twitterJordan's request is part of the Judiciary Committee's investigation into the FBI's court-authorized search of Trump's South Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago, on Aug. The Justice Department confirmed that it received Jordan's letter but declined to comment further. The attorney general's order, none of which was redacted, gave Smith the power to "prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters" and refer discrete prosecutions that may arise from the probe to the appropriate U.S. The order issued by Garland appointing Smith also authorized the special counsel to examine efforts to interfere with the transfer of power after the 2020 presidential election and the certification of Electoral College votes held on Jan. Garland announced last November that Smith would serve as special counsel to oversee the Justice Department's investigation into Trump's handling of sensitive government records and possible obstruction of the inquiry. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who chairs the Judiciary panel, requested the materials in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland on Tuesday and set a deadline of June 20 for the Justice Department to provide the committee with the memo and other documents "describing, listing, or delineating the authority and jurisdiction of the special counsel." On Wednesday, Roth testified that potential Russian interference was the frame through which Twitter viewed the Post story - even though he personally did not believe the Post article broke Twitter's rules.Washington - The Republican leader of the House Judiciary Committee is asking the Justice Department to turn over an unredacted copy of a memorandum laying out the scope of special counsel Jack Smith's investigations involving former President Donald Trump and information related to Smith's appointment to oversee the probes. Tech companies, intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement were on edge over the possibility of a Russian "hack and leak" operation, similar to what they carried out in 2016.Ĭiting its rules against sharing hacked material containing private information, Twitter showed a warning to anyone who tried to post a link to the article saying it was "potentially harmful." It also suspended the Post's Twitter account until it deleted its tweets about the story. More recently, seizing on the Twitter Files, they've pushed the claim that the government and the Biden campaign pressured Twitter to suppress the story - even though the Twitter Files disclosures do not include any evidence that was the case.Īt the time the Post article was published, it was unclear how much of the material said to come from Hunter Biden's laptop was authentic. Republicans hold up the incident as a prime example of Silicon Valley's alleged anti-conservative bias. While Twitter quickly reversed the block on the Post article and rewrote its policies within days of the original decision, the company's botched handling of the episode has been the focus of debate and controversy for more than two years. Twitter declined to do so, but Democrats seized on her testimony to rebut Republicans' claims of political bias. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and other Democratic congresswomen.Ĭollier Navaroli also testified that the Trump White House had asked Twitter to remove a tweet by celebrity Chrissy Teigen insulting the president. While the Twitter Files disclosures highlighted requests from the Biden campaign for Twitter to review tweets that might violate its policies, the committee heard testimony that Republicans also sought to influence the platform - and that the company had even changed its policies to allow Trump to post content that broke its rules.Īnika Collier Navaroli, a former Twitter safety policy employee called as a witness by committee Democrats, told the panel that Twitter removed the phrase "go back to where you came from" from its policy barring abuse of immigrants after Trump expressed the sentiment in a 2019 tweet targeting Rep. They also showed the degree to which government officials, law enforcement and politicians regularly communicate with Twitter, along with other tech platforms, by flagging content that may violate the company's policies and sharing threat assessments. They revealed incomplete glimpses of how Twitter officials deliberated over high-profile decisions, including blocking the Post article and banning then-President Donald Trump after the Jan. The files consist of internal emails, Slack chats and other material pre-dating Musk's ownership. Untangling Disinformation Elon Musk is using the Twitter Files to discredit foes and push conspiracy theories
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |